[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

WRX vs. 1.8t



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01C27BC3.E84A0740
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well, I see two problems here.  One is IF a 1.8T pulls harder with just =
FWD than an AWD car that is suppose to be over 200hp the question is do =
you NEED AWD?  I don't and probably never will NEED it so why not go for =
the lower hp lower maintenance vehicle that is faster in the first =
place?  If you don't NEED AWD then why buy a car that sells by it's hp =
that gets sucked up in the drivetrain? =20

The second problem is that anyone who believes that the WRX has the =
horsepower they advertise at the wheels is a chump.  Forever German =
manufacturers have advertised conservative wheel hp and Asian =
manufacturers have advertised liberal crank hp.  I don't know for sure =
if it has changed but I will never be convinced by an advertisement!!

I'll never own an Asian car!!

Dave
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: XXSpArCoXx@aol.com=20
  To: scirocco-l@scirocco.org=20
  Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:43 PM
  Subject: Re: WRX vs. 1.8t


  In a message dated 10/24/02 2:45:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time, =
SCIROCCO_SPEED@msn.com writes:


    but for some reason, a 150hp 1.8t in a VW seems to pull harder in =
the first few gears than a 180hp Audi ???




  Hmm lets think . . all wheel drive system. It takes more power from =
the car. Sure it won't have as much pull of the line. But you can build =
stronger motor on all wheel drive system and not worry as much about =
traction issues.

  On the Highway I have no real problem keeping up with modded 1.8t's =
with my RS where as with my 16v I tend to get drop up until the real =
high MPH's

  Ok I'm off . . I must figure out how to sequentially turbo charge my =
RS . .

  Later
  ~Danny~
  88 16v
  01 2.5 RS 
------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01C27BC3.E84A0740
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#03895e>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Well, I see two problems here.&nbsp; =
One is&nbsp;IF=20
a 1.8T pulls harder with just FWD than an AWD car that is suppose to be =
over=20
200hp the question is do you NEED AWD?&nbsp; I don't and probably never =
will=20
NEED it so why not go for the lower hp lower maintenance vehicle that is =
faster=20
in the first place?&nbsp; If you don't NEED AWD then why buy a car that =
sells by=20
it's hp&nbsp;that gets sucked up in the drivetrain?&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The second problem is that anyone who =
believes that=20
the WRX has the horsepower they advertise at the wheels is a =
chump.&nbsp;=20
Forever German manufacturers have advertised conservative wheel hp and =
Asian=20
manufacturers have advertised liberal crank hp.&nbsp; I don't know for =
sure if=20
it has changed but I will never be convinced by an =
advertisement!!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'll never own an Asian =
car!!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dave</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3DXXSpArCoXx@aol.com=20
  href=3D"mailto:XXSpArCoXx@aol.com";>XXSpArCoXx@aol.com</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dscirocco-l@scirocco.org=20
  href=3D"mailto:scirocco-l@scirocco.org";>scirocco-l@scirocco.org</A> =
</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, October 24, =
2002 12:43=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: WRX vs. 1.8t</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT lang=3D0 =
face=3DArial size=3D2=20
  FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF">In a message dated 10/24/02 2:45:17 PM Eastern =
Daylight=20
  Time, <A =
href=3D"mailto:SCIROCCO_SPEED@msn.com";>SCIROCCO_SPEED@msn.com</A>=20
  writes:<BR><BR>
  <BLOCKQUOTE=20
  style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px =
solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"=20
  TYPE=3D"CITE">but for some reason, a 150hp 1.8t in a VW seems to pull =
harder=20
    in the first few gears than a 180hp Audi =
???<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Hmm=20
  lets think . . all wheel drive system. It takes more power from the =
car. Sure=20
  it won't have as much pull of the line. But you can build stronger =
motor on=20
  all wheel drive system and not worry as much about traction =
issues.<BR><BR>On=20
  the Highway I have no real problem keeping up with modded 1.8t's with =
my RS=20
  where as with my 16v I tend to get drop up until the real high =
MPH's<BR><BR>Ok=20
  I'm off . . I must figure out how to sequentially turbo charge my RS . =

  .<BR><BR>Later<BR>~Danny~<BR>88 16v<BR>01 2.5 RS</FONT>=20
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01C27BC3.E84A0740--