So, what's up with Buffalo dyno days?

[mkii@nycap.rr.com (Josh Able)]

LOL, ya I've played with a set up that gave me numbers like that once,
pretty wild!

the only weak link is that it doesn't take into consideration that the HP is
significantly lower than that below 4000 rpms.


Josh Able
www.JsHouseOfEuro.com
"If you're already walking on thin ice, you might as well dance." -Gil
Atkinson

*GERMANY 2003 - a dub odyssey*

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason" <jason@scirocco.org>
To: "Josh Able" <mkii@nycap.rr.com>; <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: So, what's up with Buffalo dyno days?


> Josh,
>          By the way, I plugged your chart into my little application to
> measure some stuff:
>
> 0-60            5.17s
> 0-100           11.19s
> 1/4             13.68 @ 111.9 mph
> Top Speed       157mph
>
> Warning:  I recommend never, EVER trying to attain that speed in a
> Scirocco.  :)
>
> Jason
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 02:23 PM 10/21/2002, Josh Able wrote:
> >:P
> >
> >the numbers were actually higher than I figured they would be. I changed
out
> >my stock 4.0bar fpr which was giving the car way to much gas down low,
for a
> >3.0bar fpr. I noticed more gains down low, but I also knew I lost a good
> >chunk near the top. I was guessing about 245 at the wheels with 17 pounds
> >boost, instead Im at 258hp with a 10lb-ft torque improvement. Of course
this
> >is with two different brands of dynos..but..
> >
> >sadly that BMW has the power a bit more evenly spread out in the power
band
> >:P
> >
> >SDS might just help me out a tad in this!
> >
> >
> >As for Jason's VR6, that car produced damn nice numbers, and then with
just
> >changing the intake to get 19 more!!
> >
> >Makes it even more impressive that Bens 16v mkI can hang with Jason with
> >ease. :D
> >
> >
> >
> >Josh Able
> >www.JsHouseOfEuro.com
> >"If you're already walking on thin ice, you might as well dance." -Gil
> >Atkinson
> >
> >*GERMANY 2003 - a dub odyssey*
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Jason" <jason@scirocco.org>
> >To: <jdbubb@ix.netcom.com>; <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
> >Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:58 PM
> >Subject: Re: So, what's up with Buffalo dyno days?
> >
> >
> > > At 01:03 PM 10/21/2002, Dan Bubb wrote:
> > > >Any interesting results??
> > >
> > > Absolutely!  I'm surprised no one has posted yet, but I guess we're
all
> > > trying to get back to work etc...
> > >
> > > Two very noteworthy things happened (lesser of the two first);
> > >
> > > 1.  My VR6 gained 19hp over the baseline run with the mere addition of
a
> > > Neuspeed P-Flo intake.
> > >
> > > 2.  Josh Able's 1.8T Scirocco put (are you sitting?) 258hp and
257lb-ft of
> > > torque to the wheels.
> > >
> > > I'm going to repeat that because it sounds vaguely impressive:
> > >
> > >          2500lb car.
> > >          258 horsepower to the wheels.
> > >          257 ft-lb of torque to the wheels.
> > >
> > > Using the old 15% estimate, that would be around 300hp at the motor.
> > >
> > > That's a power to weight ratio of 8.3 lb/hp.  The 4.9-second 0-60
screamer
> > > BMW E46 M3 has a power-to-weight ratio (333hp, 3400lb) of 10.2:1.
> > >
> > > el sicko, no?
> > >
> > > Jason
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Scirocco-l mailing list
> > > Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> > > http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
> > >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Scirocco-l mailing list
> >Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> >http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>
>