[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 86 16V vs. 2.0 16V Talon

To: "Neal Tovsen" <sixteen.volt@verizon.net>,<Captnbr@aol.com>,<tpiwonka@ttacs.ttu.edu>,<Scirocco-L@scirocco.org>
Subject: RE: 86 16V vs. 2.0 16V Talon
From: "Scott F. Williams" <sfwilliams@home.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:31:15 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <NEBBIEKHMECHOMGGONEFKENCDCAA.sixteen.volt@verizon.net>
Sender: owner-scirocco-l@scirocco.org

Neal wrote:
> The downside is that they have an incredibly weak transmission,

Heh heh, from a 323GTX point of view, we always drool over how *strong* the
DSM trannies are! In fact, I got a lead on a really inexpensive Galant VR4
yesterday. I was very tempted to sell the GTX for it. But... then I came to
my senses. :^)
--
Scott F. Williams
NJ Scirocco nut
Golf GTI 16v rallycar
Mazda 323 GTX turbo assault vehicle

Check out our rally team's website!
http://www.usrallyteam.com


--
Email LIST problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org.
To unsubscibe send "unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to majordomo@scirocco.org

Follow-Ups:
- RE: 86 16V vs. 2.0 16V Talon
  - From: Brad Sheridan <brads@mindspring.com>

References:
- RE: 86 16V vs. 2.0 16V Talon
  - From: "Neal Tovsen" <sixteen.volt@verizon.net>

Prev by Date: Re: coolant light
Next by Date: Re: coolant light
Prev by thread: RE: 86 16V vs. 2.0 16V Talon
Next by thread: RE: 86 16V vs. 2.0 16V Talon
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread