RE: 2.0 vs 1.8 16V head on a 9A Block.

[16V Jason <jason@scirocco.org>]

At 09:13 AM 8/8/2001 , Lauri Pettai wrote:
>Please scan it, I'd love to read it.

I second that! :)

And what would be really cool is if Bill, you could scan your stock (yeah, 
yeah, plus a muffler) dyno result and someone else has a stock 2.0/2.0 dyno 
curve that we can compare it to, we'd have somewhat of a basis for comparison.

In the meantime, thanks to all so far and I'll keep researching.  You all 
know how I am; I won't stop unless I have a controlled experiment done, and 
will of course post my results. :)

Shut up Meze. :)

Thanks,
Jason



>Lauri!
>'84 1.8 16v Scirocco GTX Kamei X1 Bodykit (VIN025736)
>Soon to be 2.0 16v
>
> > There was an article in European car probably about 10 years ago on the
> > 16V heads. Specifically, about TT's Street Port 16V head. It had flow
> > graphs, intake and exhaust for the 1.8, 2.0 and ported heads.
> > The stock 1.8 intake flows better than the 2.0.
> > The stock 2.0 exhaust flows better than the 1.8.
> > Ported is a big improvement over the best of each and either head can be
> > ported for the same end result.
> > I still have the article. If anyone's interested I can look up the
> > specific numbers or maybe even scan it. I also recall seeing flow graphs
> > in TT's old "Amazing dyno stories" that I also still have. Some things
> > you just don't throw away.
> > Dan
>
>
>--
>Email LIST problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org.
>To unsubscibe send "unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to 
>majordomo@scirocco.org


--
Email LIST problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org.
To unsubscibe send "unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to majordomo@scirocco.org