[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Intake Header



My 88 Grand Am had that. Fast and a nice engine, except the head gasket had
a life expectancy of 50K. It was a job most places wouldn't do. It was a
$500 - 600 job.
John
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Erik" <pats16v@columbus.rr.com>
To: "Erik" <pats16v@columbus.rr.com>; "Kervin Ridgley"
<carsandkites@gmail.com>; <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: Intake Header


> The Quad Four.  That was the name
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Erik" <pats16v@columbus.rr.com>
> To: "Kervin Ridgley" <carsandkites@gmail.com>; <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 8:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Intake Header
>
>
> > It would work.  Go to a Junk Yard and find a early 90's GM Cutlass,
Grand
> > Am, etc w/ the 2.3L 4cyl.  Wild Stuff.  I forget the name of the motor
but
> > it was the early version of the Chevy Ecotech.
> >
> > Erik
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Kervin Ridgley" <carsandkites@gmail.com>
> > To: <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 12:04 PM
> > Subject: Intake Header
> >
> >
> >>I was thinking about ways to get the the intake side to flow better.
> >> Would something like a intake header help.  By spacing out the intake
> >> sucks (you know, the opposite of exhaust pulses), would it "scavenge"
> >> more air in?  Just a crazy idea I was having.
> >>
> >> Kervin
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Scirocco-l mailing list
> >> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> >> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Scirocco-l mailing list
> > Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> > http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l