twin - possibility of a2 subframes?

[amalventano@sc.rr.com (Allyn)]

i've been to junkyards around here, not many vdubs at all, unfortunately
ACN trannies for $75??? jesus, i could use like 2-3 of em
where are you at again???
i would kill to do ACN instead of FF on the twin (~8 years newer, probably
much less miles on them, factory lsd, etc).
Al

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rabbit16v" <Rabbit16v@attbi.com>
To: "Scirocco List" <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: twin - possibility of a2 subframes?


> Defineately A2 subs.  As far as where to get them???  Have you ever been
to
> a junkyard?  There are mor A2s in a junkyard than all German cars put
> together.  Atleast out here there is!!  Anyone need an ACN tranny?  $75 ea
> in our pick-a-part and there are GOBS!
>
> Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Allyn" <amalventano@sc.rr.com>
> To: "scirocco list" <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 2:47 PM
> Subject: twin - possibility of a2 subframes?
>
>
> > ok, i've been uneducated in the past when o-so many listers have told me
> to
> > use an a2 subframe in the twin. the events from this past weekend
(clutch
> > release arm finger snapped on the jetta, much thanks to Ron for the tech
> > assist), have given me some more insight as to just how the a2 subframe
is
> > laid out. enough insight to possibly justify using a2 subframes (yes, 2)
> on
> > the twin.
> >
> > pros:
> > - simpler tubular subframe design in area of engines (fewer tie points,
> > slightly less weight as well)
> > - future engine upgrades possible (twin vr6 anyone?)
> > - can possibly use newer hubs that hold larger bearings
> > - simpler removal/install of engines for rebuild
> >
> > cons:
> > - many parts are not on hand (would need 2 sets of all mounts, mount
> > brackets, subframes, power steering racks, suspension arms, hubs, etc)
> > - expense of engine mounts (possibility of molding/making urethane
mounts
> > from broken old a2 mounts in-house?)
> > - possible net weight increase in the end (due to added weight of
> subframes)
> >
> > so, guys/gals, what should i do? stick with a1 style (cheaper, but more
> > intrusive/complex subframe), or go with a2 (making the subframe simpler,
> but
> > adding expense)???
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Scirocco-l mailing list
> > Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> > http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>