Re: 8v 2.0 L vs. 16v 2.0 L

["Owen" <rabeys@cadvision.com>]

> >>I guess it depends on the budget.  if you already have a 16v car, then
i
> would definatly stick with it.  I'm sure with the same amount of money
put
> into an 8v and a 16v, you would have a faster 8v, but if you have a large
> budget, go with the 16v IMHO of course.
> 
> 
> Really?  You think that if you took at stock 8v and stock 16v, ands put
> say $5000 dollars in to each,(no more, no less), that the 8v would be
> faster?  i think i might have to disagree.


Of course not, but i'm talking budget wise.  if you put say, $1000, into
either one,  you'll get alot more for your money in an 8v, where a 16v, you
may get a good  set of cams, and thats about it.  I can't even think of
enough things to do to an engine for 5g's, staying normally aspirated and
same displacement.  but i'd still stick with my 16v any day.  


Owen
87 16v
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Garage/1571
- --
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send email to scirocco-L-request@scirocco.org,
with your request (subscribe, unsubscribe) in the BODY of the message.

------------------------------