[Still OT] Evolution of man Kind !! was: [way ot] superbowlRANT

[MAWeiler at LancasterGeneral.org (Weiler, Michael A)]

ROFL



-----Original Message-----
From: Euroroc II [mailto:flaatr@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 11:43 AM
To: T Berk; Weiler, Michael A
Cc: Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
Subject: Re: [Still OT] Evolution of man Kind !! was: [way ot] superbowl
RANT


With all this going on I've decided to put the bra on my 16V before I
take 
it out next time...

Wouldn't want to shock anyone :-P

-Raffi


At 06:39 AM 2/6/2004, T Berk wrote:
>Weiler, Michael A wrote:
>
>TBerk wrote:
>><snip>
>>>btw- Pro Choice doesn't = Pro Abortion.
>>  <snip>
>>>TBerk
>
> > Pro means for correct?
> >
>
>I'll agree so far.
>
>pro1    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (pr)
>n. pl. pros
>
>    1. An argument or consideration in favor of something: weighing the
> pros and cons.
>    2. One who supports a proposal or takes the affirmative side in a
debate.
>
>adv.
>     In favor; affirmatively: arguing pro and con.
>
>adj.
>     Affirmative; supporting: a pro vote.
>
> >
> > You are for the rights to chose to have an abortion right?
> >
>
>Yep, I say it's not up to YOU or ME to tell HER whether she can or 
>can't
>have one.  The key word here is CHOICE.
>
>
> > You are therefore pro abortion...
>
>Nope, It's not binary: I'm AGAINST them.  Your 'therefore' doesn't 
>apply.
>
>btw- nothing personal, just trying for understanding & to be 
>understood.
>
> > (ok for the right to have a abortion but
> > either way it leads to giving the choice
> > to have an abortion and supporting that decision).
> >
>
>
>Let's take this off list. It's so OT.
>
>
>TBerk - to paraphrase the Talking Heads:
>Damn, how did I get here?
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Scirocco-l mailing list
>Scirocco-l@scirocco.org 
>http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l