[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

The 'lowered' Jetta debate.....Part Deux

Subject: The 'lowered' Jetta debate.....Part Deux
From: bronson@inwave.com (Nate Mellom)
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:44:07 -0600
References: <F57UAede5ce7bn1peXW00017467@hotmail.com> <3E206ECB.A39658DA@mindspring.com> <002f01c2b9ab$d5510c80$d6edd50c@attbi.com> <3E20F19C.6020809@inwave.com>

Then again....
<http://www.snopes2.com/photos/lumber.htm>
I dunno.

References:
- OT: thats one way to lower it...
  - From: nightmare16v1988@hotmail.com (Krazy Horse)
- OT: thats one way to lower it...
  - From: tberk@mindspring.com (T Berk)
- OT: thats one way to lower it...
  - From: Rabbit16v@attbi.com (Rabbit16v)
- The 'lowered' Jetta debate.....
  - From: bronson@inwave.com (Nate Mellom)

Prev by Date: The 'lowered' Jetta debate.....
Next by Date: [OT] Funny sign...
Previous by thread: The 'lowered' Jetta debate.....
Next by thread: OT: thats one way to lower it...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread