Runners on 2.0 vs. 1.8, 16v

[rfkellner at snet.net (Rick Kellner)]

I think match porting the two runners is an excellent and relatively
easy idea.  And of course match port them to the head too.
What about the larger plenum on the 2.0?  Is it needed to compensate for
the larger runners to develop more low end torque?
Rick K.

-----Original Message-----
From: scirocco-l-bounces@scirocco.org
[mailto:scirocco-l-bounces@scirocco.org] On Behalf Of MkIIVR6@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 5:47 PM
To: davidwinchell2@sprynet.com; scirocco-l@scirocco.org
Subject: Re: Runners on 2.0 vs. 1.8, 16v

I heard exactly the oppsite,The reason the bigger runners were a euro
only 
item was that us Americans do alot of stopandgo driving. Europeans have
highways 
(mmmmm...Autobahn), the larger runners move the HP #'s up the powerband.
Here's an idea, what would gasketmatching a 40mm scirocco upper to a
42mm 2.0 
lower do, any ideas?
Jason
_______________________________________________
Scirocco-l mailing list
Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l