16v head on a 1.7L engine

[amalventano1@home.com (Allyn)]

lol, now im mr. rieger :)
interesting info, didnt know it was that drastic.
wonder what the best stock-type head/block combo would be for a budget turbo
setup (i.e. drop cr to 8.5ish with least restricted flow).
Al

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott F. Williams" <sfwilliams@home.com>
To: "Allyn" <amalventano1@home.com>; <jester@westfailure.net>; "Jerry
Carter" <jerry.carter@shaw.ca>
Cc: "Scirocco List" <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:34 PM
Subject: RE: 16v head on a 1.7L engine


> Mr. Reiger wrote:
> >     Yea, but enough to drop THAT low???
> > Al
>
> Sure, the 8v head/16v bottom end combo yields about a 14:1 CR. This is 4:1
> higher than a 1.8l 16v, for instance. Plopping the 16v head on a 1.7l
motor
> will have the reverse effect. You do the math. :^)
> --
> Scott F. Williams
> NJ Scirocco nut
> Golf GTI 16v rollycar
> Mazda 323 GTX turbo assaulted vehicle
> '99 Subaru Impreza 2.5 RS (coming soon)
> ClubVAC: "Roads found. Drivers wanted."
>
> Check out our rally team's website!
> http://www.usrallyteam.com
>
>
>