Re: 2H vs. 4K vs. FK - which is best for 16v

["Allyn" <amalventano1@home.com>]

Steve,
The only difference between a 4k and a 2h is that the 4k has a .89 5th, 2k
has a .91 5th.
it'll be a bit more buzzy on the highway, but it wont matter if you plan on
putting in a steeper 5th gear later (or before you bother putting the tranny
on the car).
now for a fk, its the same as a 2h from 1st to 5th, but has a 3.89 final
drive (fn and 2h have 3.94 final drive).
hope this helps,
Al

Allyn Malventano, ETC(SS), USN
87 Rieger GTO Scirocco 16v (daily driver, 170k, rocco #6) running - for now
87 Jetta 8v Wolfsburg 2dr (daily driver, 260k, 0 rattles, original clutch,
driveshafts, wheels :)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Mikolajczuk" <scirocco-16v@mediaone.net>
To: "Scirocco-l" <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 9:03 PM
Subject: 2H vs. 4K vs. FK - which is best for 16v


> I ordered a 4K from a junkyard but they sent me a 2H - the guy at the junk
> yard has no clue about vw stuff - will this work in an 86 16v 2.0l roc? I
> plan on putting a qauife in and also a taller 5th gear.  if it isn't worth
> it I will send it back and try to find a 4k again.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
>
> --
> Email LIST problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org.
> To unsubscibe send "unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to
majordomo@scirocco.org
>
>


--
Email LIST problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org.
To unsubscibe send "unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to majordomo@scirocco.org