Pulp Friction Page Five
Calculating the Distance
       Okay, last equation of the day. Given a vehicle speed of, say, 100 miles per hour, and the deceleration level from above, we can now calculate the distance required to bring the car to a stop. But, in order to make sure the answer comes out in feet, we first need to juggle the numbers around a little bit:

   100 miles per hour = 147 feet per second
   0.84g = 27.0 feet per second per second
 
       Apply the equation for stopping distance
{distance = (initial speed x initial speed) / (deceleration x 2)}
and lo and behold, exactly 400 feet are required to bring this car down to a stop from 100 miles per hour given our original pedal input force of 90 pounds. Tah dah! The car is now stopped.
 
Limiting Factors
       From this example, it would appear that in order to make the car stop in a shorter distance, there are two options:

  1) Change the brake system to increase the force between the tire and the road for a given pedal input force.
 
  2) Press on the brake pedal harder.
       This theory holds true, but only up to a point. Anyone who has even driven on an icy road will get this right away. As the brake pedal force is gradually increased, the deceleration rate will also increase until the point at which the tires lock. Beyond this point, additional force applied to the brake pedal does nothing more than make the driver's leg sore. The vehicle will continue to decelerate at the rate governed by the coefticient of friction between the tires and the road. As you can imagine, the coefficient of a given tire on ice is much lower than the coefficient of that same tire on dry pavement, hence the increased deceleration possible on the dry, paved surface.

       You can take this one to the bank. Regardless of your huge rotor diameter, brake pedal ratio, magic brake pad material, or number of pistons in your calipers, your maximum deceleration is limited every time by the tire to road interface. That is the point of this whole article. Your brakes do not stop your car. Your tires stop the car. So while changes to different parts of the brake system may affect certain characteristics or traits of the system's behavior, using stickier tires is ultimately the only sure-fire method of decreasing stopping distances.
 
So, Why Would Anyone Want to Modify Their Brakes?
       If changing braking system components does not provide increased stopping power or shorter stopping distances, why even consider changes in the first place? Why not just leave the brakes alone and buy new tires? Quite simply, making changes to your braking system can have a very real, very significant impact on four areas of brake system performance other than stopping distance:
   1) Driver tuning: Modifying your brake system component sizing (brake pedal ratio, master cylinder piston diameter, caliper piston diameter, rotor diameter) can be performed to adjust the feel of the car to suit the driver's tastes. Some drivers prefer a high, hard pedal, while others prefer a longer stroke. In this regard, tuning your brakes is a lot like tuning your shocks: every driver likes something different, and there is no right answer within certain functional limits. These components can be adjusted in small steps to achieve a feel that the driver prefers.
 
   2) Thermal control: Modifying your brake system mass (rotor weight) can be used if there is a thermal concern in the braking system. If your brakes work consistently under your driving conditions, then adding "size" to the braking system will accomplish nothing more than increasing the weight of your vehicle. But if high temperatures are having an adverse effect on braking system performance or other components in general--wheel bearings, for example--then you should consider super-sizing. Of course, brake cooling ducts can really help out here as well.
 
   3) Temperature sensitivity: Modifying your brakes to address the presence of high temperatures (brake pad material and brake fluid composition) should only be considered if your thermal concerns cannot be resolved by super-sizing. This is really just a Band-Aid for undersized systems, like those found on Showroom Stock race cars that are not permitted by their rules to upsize or cool their brakes. One might argue that it is more cost effective to install better brake pads and brake fluid than it would be to upsize the rotors, but all that heat still needs to go somewhere--and more often than not it will find the next weak link in the system.
 
   4) Compliance: Any changes that you can make to your braking system to reduce compliance will increase the overall efficiency of the system--improving pedal feel, wear, and stop-to-stop consistency. Think of it as balancing and blueprinting your braking system. Brake system modifications have their place to help make your ride more consistent, predictable, and user-friendly; however, if your ultimate goal is to decrease your stopping distance, look no further than the four palm-sized patches of rubber connecting your ride to the ground.
 
James Walker; JR: of scR motorsports races a 1992 Saturn SC in the SCCAs ITA class. His real job as an anti-lock braking systems engineer with the Robert Bosch Corporation has him applying these very same brake system princiales on a day-to-day basis. To find out more about his scR motorsports race team, visit
www.teamscR.com.