From: "Dan Bubb" <jdbubb@ix.netcom.com>
Date: 2005/02/28 Mon AM 08:33:25 EST
To: "David Utley" <fahrvegnugen@cox.net>,
"Sciroccolist" <Scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Subject: Re: Low bunny
The camber change and toe change characteristics will be pretty much unchanged.
But he's drastically reduced the rear roll stiffness. The "T" cross section provides alot of the
rear roll stiffness and by cutting it only the springs now resist roll.
Net effect??
The car will understeer like a pig!
You'd need a pretty massive rear swaybar to rebalance the chassis.
And after having done that you will have seen NO net benefit.
Dan
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 11:04 AM
Subject: RE: Low bunny
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scirocco-l-bounces@scirocco.org
> [mailto:scirocco-l-bounces@scirocco.org]On Behalf Of Larry Fry
> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 8:05 PM
> To: Scourge; Sciroccolist
> Subject: Re: Low bunny
>
> What a brilliantly simple IRS!!!
> Some nice workmanship.
>
> Larry
> sandiego16v
>
>
>
>
> Do you see a benefit for the street/track with this setup?
>
> David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l
>