OT: intent...WAS Re: [Re: Oh baby!]

[Joe.Doty@lcnetwork.com (Joe Doty)]

I concur.  It leads to dissention among the ranks.

Joe Doty
IT/Development
joe@lcnetwork.com=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Collins [mailto:kcollins1@socal.rr.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:17 PM
> To: Scirocco List
> Subject: Re: OT: intent...WAS Re: [Re: Oh baby!]
>=20
> Anson Clement wrote:
>=20
> > Facts? You mean conjecture! Colly dog did a lot of guess work, I was
> > astounded at how weak his argument was.
>=20
> ENOUGH war talk!  Let's PLEASE keep this off the list.  It's
completely
> out of place, whether or not "OT" precedes the topic.  Sheesh!
>=20
> --
> Kevin Collins
> Huntington Beach, CA
> '86.5 16v 2.0
> '02 GTI 337
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l