need rocco weight numbers

[amalventano1@comcast.net (Allyn)]

i ran across one of those shock absorber front bumpers, it was noticably heavier than the
non-hydraulic one, i'd say probably heavier by 10-15 pounds. i had a good comparison, as the
soon-to-be twin came with a us *front* bumper on *both* front and rear (go figure the rear one had
the hydraulic absorbers, heheh).
Al

----- Original Message -----
From: "STENDEC" <dan@angband.org>
To: <scirocco-l@scirocco.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: need rocco weight numbers


> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:33:27PM -0400, Shawn C Meze wrote:
>
> > My 82 weighs 2380 with me in it.
> > My 84 weighs 2320 with me in it. Dunno why the 84 (with a sunroof) weighs
> > less but, it does. The 82 is sunroofless yet bears a roll bar.
>
> Doesn't the 82 have a full-size spare, and the 84 have a mini spare?
>
> That could account for a few pounds...  Also, didn't early MKII cars have
> bumpers which included hydraulic shock absorbtion?
>
> Your 82 have any equipment the '84 doesn't?  AC, PS, etc?
>
> all I can think of...
>
> Dan
>
> --
> It isn't pollution that's harming the environment. It's the impurities in
> our air and water that are doing it.
>
> -- Dan Quayle
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scirocco-l mailing list
> Scirocco-l@scirocco.org
> http://neubayern.net/mailman/listinfo/scirocco-l