[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cams, Autoblech vs. Schricks

To: "Victor Farren" <vfarren@smtp.cdie.org>
Subject: Re: Cams, Autoblech vs. Schricks
From: Riley McDowall <roog@home.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:07:22 -0800
Cc: scirocco-l@scirocco.org
In-Reply-To: <sa37836f.066@smtp.cdie.org>
Sender: owner-scirocco-l@scirocco.org

At 2:10 PM -0500 12/13/00, Victor Farren wrote:
>Anyone have the Schrick combo,a nd care to comment on them????

I don't have the Schrick combo but I do have the equivalent Piper combo.
Dyno tests show that they'll give you a really nice, flat torque curve, and
deliver pretty good power from 4k on up to 6700 or so.  Idle is definitely
cammy, but it won't bug you too much (YMMV of course!).  I like 'em!!



--
Email LIST problems to: scirocco-l-probs@scirocco.org. To unsubscibe send
"unsubscribe scirocco-l" in the message to majordomo@scirocco.org

References:
- Cams, Autoblech vs. Schricks
  - From: "Victor Farren" <vfarren@rrs.cdie.org>

Prev by Date: RE: TBerks says: Check this Out!
Next by Date: RE: TBerks says: Check this Out!
Prev by thread: Cams, Autoblech vs. Schricks
Next by thread: Re: Cams, Autoblech vs. Schricks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread